When we do shastra vichara, to know the atma, we rely on the guru to unfold the meaning of words of the shastra.
Take for instance the meaning of the word satyam. Satyam is sometimes translated into english. And understood as substratum. Any english translation can be used, but it is crucial to understand the appropriate meaning of the word used. If I use the word substratum, many meanings are possible for substratum.
Substratum can mean that, the soil is the substratum of a lawn. So there is soil as substratum, and grass grows on top of the lawn. So is that the same as satyam. Answer is NO. That is not what we mean by satyam as used in shastra. So what does satyam mean in shastra.
Substratum can mean that, the soil is the substratum of a lawn. So there is soil as substratum, and grass grows on top of the lawn. So is that the same as satyam. Answer is NO. That is not what we mean by satyam as used in shastra. So what does satyam mean in shastra.
Shastra gives example, one of which is gold and chain and bangle etc.
If you take any form of gold, say a bangle. Here the bangle is all in all GOLD. It is fully gold alone. However the bangle is still present. we cant say there is no bangle, there is only gold. No I can wear the bangle, so something called bangle IS. The bangle has no existence of its own. Bangle draws its existence from gold. Bangles existence is gold, but bangle has a certain meaning. Shastra calls the bangle, the chain, the earring as mithya. And gold as satyam. As you can see the bangle, chain, earring all are gold, all are satyam alone. You dont need to FIND the substratum , deep inside, there is no need to go underneath. If we go underneath, break down gold further, we will get atoms of gold, we wil get electrons, protons, neutrons etc.
This doesnt say anything , simply says even gold is not satyam. Gold is also mithya. So how to define satyam, what is the lakshana (unique definition) for satyam?
Simple, satyam is 'that which does not draw its existence from anything else', 'is 'self existent'.
Shastra uses another word gnanam. Gnanam means that which IS, the knower, known knowledge all the three is gnanam. The gnanam is from the root word 'gna'. Gna is the root for gnata, gnanaa and gneya all the three. The content of knower, known, knowlege is gna. This gna is conscious. Is there any source of consciousness other than atma, other than you? NO, only source of consciousness or gnanam, or gna dhatu, is you. So you are the gnanam, and you are self evident, self existent, you do not need to become evident to yourself, yo uare self evident. You are self existent, you ARE, hence you meet the definition of satyam. So you are satyam. So are you the substance of all that is here, as satyam. Answer is YES.
So is the tree you?
Yes! Since the tree is satyam. The treeness is an attribute of satyam alone. We have already seen the need for a 'self existent' ISness. And that is you alone. So you are the tree as well.
How can you say that? I cant be a tree...
If you take any form of gold, say a bangle. Here the bangle is all in all GOLD. It is fully gold alone. However the bangle is still present. we cant say there is no bangle, there is only gold. No I can wear the bangle, so something called bangle IS. The bangle has no existence of its own. Bangle draws its existence from gold. Bangles existence is gold, but bangle has a certain meaning. Shastra calls the bangle, the chain, the earring as mithya. And gold as satyam. As you can see the bangle, chain, earring all are gold, all are satyam alone. You dont need to FIND the substratum , deep inside, there is no need to go underneath. If we go underneath, break down gold further, we will get atoms of gold, we wil get electrons, protons, neutrons etc.
This doesnt say anything , simply says even gold is not satyam. Gold is also mithya. So how to define satyam, what is the lakshana (unique definition) for satyam?
Simple, satyam is 'that which does not draw its existence from anything else', 'is 'self existent'.
Shastra uses another word gnanam. Gnanam means that which IS, the knower, known knowledge all the three is gnanam. The gnanam is from the root word 'gna'. Gna is the root for gnata, gnanaa and gneya all the three. The content of knower, known, knowlege is gna. This gna is conscious. Is there any source of consciousness other than atma, other than you? NO, only source of consciousness or gnanam, or gna dhatu, is you. So you are the gnanam, and you are self evident, self existent, you do not need to become evident to yourself, yo uare self evident. You are self existent, you ARE, hence you meet the definition of satyam. So you are satyam. So are you the substance of all that is here, as satyam. Answer is YES.
So is the tree you?
Yes! Since the tree is satyam. The treeness is an attribute of satyam alone. We have already seen the need for a 'self existent' ISness. And that is you alone. So you are the tree as well.
How can you say that? I cant be a tree...
Arre, when it is being said you are the tree, it is implied we are talking about you are the satyam, and tree is satyam, Hence you are the tree.
We know already that the attribute tree IS, attribute Mind IS. But what Is is satyam alone, which is you.
We know already that the attribute tree IS, attribute Mind IS. But what Is is satyam alone, which is you.
By being the sky, does satyam become less satyam than it is being the tree? So is there two satyams? the tree satyam and the sky satyam? Arre when you count satyam, there is only one. Advayam brahma. this is non dual.
Words have to be understood, shastra is all about shabda pramana. Words are unfolded by guru and understood by sishya, in same way as understood by guru. Which is gnanam. Which is atma gnanam.
Harhara parvati pataye
harahara mahadeva.
harahara mahadeva.