The doings of a jivanmukta

The jivanmukta is a non doer, as there isnt a second thing, he is beyond action and inaction.

He is the absolute.

He is shiva the absolute.

He alone is, and besides him there isnt a second entity.

This transcendental entity alone is ishvara, as he alone becomes the controller with regard to the shakti maya.

This trancendental entity does without doing, creates without creating, mantains without mantaining, manifests without manifesting.

So all power, all wealth is non separate from the transendental self.

Experience of a mukta

A mukta is free from all experiences, a mukta us unborn, a mukta undergoes no experiences. A mukta is not related to anything that happens in the temporal world. A mukta is asanga.

What happens in the relative world remains relative, the experiences undergone remain experiential, in thier own lower degree of reality.  Remains untrue.

Mukta is non dual, for him there isnt a second thing.

Difference between mithya and non existent

The logical issues with advaita "seem" to arise, when we say THIS or IDAM jagad , or THIS maya jagad, or this jagad which has as its cause the maya shakti non separate from atma, "Doesnt Exist".

When we say "doesnt exist" or "non existent" its a problem, since on the one had we are pointing it out as "this" or "idam" which purports certain existence, while on the other hand we say "non existent".

Hence when we say in english, we need to translate correctly.

What we say is "mithya" which means, "negatable existence".
That which exists, but is negated, once it is negated, the negator, the one who negates, is also to be taken into consideration.

The negator in vedantic sense, doesnt exist. This is since, there is no operation on will in the case of vedanta. It is only a pramana. When the eye comes in contact with the object of perception, seeing happens.
Same way when the shrota comes in contact with mahavakya, knowledge happens and removes ajnana. When ajnana is removed, then mukti is not an event, rather bandha is negated by jnana.

Same way universe is resolved in its cause, and the cause is taken to be the self, then the mahavakya negates the causal status also, leaving the shrota as such as atma.

Thus it is found that there is no real process of mukti at all for the atma.


Hence swami paramarthananda says that the whole pursuit of moksa is negated.

Anirvachaniyam

That which is not present always, in all 3 periods of time, how can that be sat. As we transact in the waking state, we can see how the waking state is present only transactionally, its constantly changing, and there is not object which stays unchanged in all 3 periods of time. And in fact , when we analyse using the shruti, quite clearly this reality resolves in atma the absolute, existence. So that which can be negated, how can that be sat.

So our transactional reality is mithya only, it cannot be sat, it is not totally non existent also, not asat. Hence it is sat asat, anirvachaniyam.

Shivam Shankaram

Shivam Shankaram,
Shivam Shankaram , Tripura rishvaram
Namami Tadeva, Antara ishvaram
Shivam Shankaram,

Dayananda Rupam,
Dayananda Rupam, Parvati MAtaram
Sada satya sindhu purarishvaram

Vishvayonim prabhum, ardhanarishvaram
Sarva vedanta sambodha sarveshvaram

Shivam shankaram, tripurarishvaram
Namami tadeva, antara ishvaram

Shivam Shankaram

Hare VasudevAtmabodha pradam
PrasAdarpana budhida ishvaram

Dakshinamurti Devam, Shankaram Padmapadam
Asmadacharya vedanta, sampradaya prabhum tvam

Shivam shankaram, tripurarishvaram
Namami tadeva, antara ishvaram

Shivam Shankaram

Talk on Gita in Tamil + English

This is a 40 minute talk I recorded as an introduction to Gitas spiritual lesson, I recorded it in simple tamil + english. So mainly meant for anyone who knows tamil and interested.

My goal is to demistify yoga of gita, that there is nothing out of the world and how gita is relevant and speaks to every individual, if we are willing to simply listen.

Harih OM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=854r3_4h0_Y