Maya has played its trick on me. I tried to imagine the maya prapancha resolving itself in brahman. Maya is situated in brahman from its own standpoint and its own reality is in brahman. This is known via shastra. It need not manifest as ones experience. Given experience is itself mithya. When we try to explain experience we use mithya vada. When we accept the mithyatvam of experience, given brahman or self alone is satyam, and from brahmans standpoint there is no explanation etc. there is nothing else in the first place. From mithya standpoint only we are talking about brahman and moksha and all that, all the time from the mithya standpoint while being satyam all the time.
So I am satyam, me saying this is mithya, me explaining it is mithya, me seeing the self as satyam is mithya, me explaining the world as mithya is mithya. By explaining the world as mithya, my smallness is mithya, I am the all pervading satyam. Ishvaras maya is mithya, ishvara is me the same all pervading satyam. That is the oneness of me and ishvara, we only differ in name and form and not in reality. Our reality is one and the same, non dual.
