I am anantam satyam, given I am the timeless sakshi that is the truth of the jagat.
I am anantam jnanam, given I am the timeless sakshi that is the reality of the jagat.
I am anantam satyam jnanam, given I am the timeless sakshi and the jagat is not other than me, though I am independent of the jagat, which in turn has no independent existence of its own.
Jagat being dependent on me, and having its reality in me, resolves in me.
The resolution is not an experiential resolution, rather is like deep sleep where it resolves unto me and arises from me.
That is because it has its being in me.
That which has its being in me, is not a second entity. Rather is a mithya entity.
I feel that mithya entity cannot be accepted as advaitam, as there are 2 , but are pot and clay two entities?
Is there a pot and a clay that is separate?
Jagat is non separate from atma the sakshi chaitanyam. That is the upanishadic pramana.
There is both atma anatma viveka, as well as atma anatama understanding of anatma being non separate from atma, anatma being mithya. Hence there is no anatma, atma itself is mithya anatma, wherein atma is the satyam, jnanam , anantam brahma.
