Is there really two things, when there is seer, and the seen.
Is the seen, and the seer seperated by some boundary, in that case the seer is also one amongst the seen.
You can never find a boundary of separation between what is seen, and the seer yourself.
You can never find the seer behind the seen, outside the seen, inside the seen and so on.
Those attributes that you superimpose, are superimposed on the seer, the truth of the seer alone, and not any other locus for committing the mistake.
The locus of ignorance is atman alone, the locus of jagad is atma, the locus of ishvara is atman.
Is the seen, and the seer seperated by some boundary, in that case the seer is also one amongst the seen.
You can never find a boundary of separation between what is seen, and the seer yourself.
You can never find the seer behind the seen, outside the seen, inside the seen and so on.
Those attributes that you superimpose, are superimposed on the seer, the truth of the seer alone, and not any other locus for committing the mistake.
The locus of ignorance is atman alone, the locus of jagad is atma, the locus of ishvara is atman.
No comments:
Post a Comment