Brahman is understood with two kinds of lakshanas.
Tatastha lakshana, and svarupa lakshana
Tatastha lakshana defines brahman as jagad kAranam. It is the vivarta upAdana karanam, with maya shakti. Maya is mithya, and trigunatmika. Maya is brahman. Brahman is satyam, triguna rahita, or nirguna.
Svarupa lakshana defines brahman to be satchitananda atma. Chit refers to self evident consciousness. We understand atma as the witness consciousness, that is self evident. Witness the name is with reference to the witnessed, so the witnessing is a nama rupa, and by itself atma is just chit, self evident. Hence atma or brahman need not be known , and need not be a knower also. It exists, is self evident, and self existent. Also it is anantam, as it does not have the limitations belonging to the known universe, such as space time limitation, or attribute wise limitations.
Hence atma is satchitananda, atma is brahman, satchitananda.
So in two fold manner brahman is understood. In terms of its svarupa lakshana, brahman is satyamjnanamanantam.
In terms of tatastha lakshana, brahman is jagad karanam, wherein the karanam status is mithya. The karyam is non separate from karanam and is also mithya.
This two fold status is important as it establishes non duality as the truth. Advaitam as the truth, and oneself as the advaita satyam.
Oneself need not be known. Oneself need not be proved to be limitless or self existent. Oneself is to be understood to be brahman. Brahman is to be understood as satyam. Jagad or ishvara(bhagavan) being mithya is to be understood as none other than oneself, oneself is the being , the reality.