We do say that awareness has names and forms and functions.
How do we say that, we say that w.r.t the srshti.
When we say space IS, spaceness is the attribute and the IS refers to awareness.
However the mind raises a "doubt" that any attribute is the seen, and separate from the seer.
This isnt true, there is no separateness in terms of space. Seer isnt even available as an object, to be seen to be separate in terms of space. Then what is it which we call as seer , seer simply is the very vastu which is referred to in terms of its attributes of spaceness and so on, when we say "space is" for instance. We can instead say "spacy atma is", atma being self evident I,need not be known, and what is known is its spacyness alone.
How do we say that, we say that w.r.t the srshti.
When we say space IS, spaceness is the attribute and the IS refers to awareness.
However the mind raises a "doubt" that any attribute is the seen, and separate from the seer.
This isnt true, there is no separateness in terms of space. Seer isnt even available as an object, to be seen to be separate in terms of space. Then what is it which we call as seer , seer simply is the very vastu which is referred to in terms of its attributes of spaceness and so on, when we say "space is" for instance. We can instead say "spacy atma is", atma being self evident I,need not be known, and what is known is its spacyness alone.
No comments:
Post a Comment