When we talk about consciousness being satyam, and jagad mithya, we keep in mind the fact that satyam is arUpa, and mithya is sarupa.
Satyam is attributeless or formless, and mithya has form or attributes.
So when we say vishvarupa darshana of satchidananda, one has to marvel at the usage of the words.
When we see a gold chain, it is chain rupa darshana of the satyam gold. In that case the drshta is different from drshya, since the drshya is a gold chain, while the drshta is a conscious seer.
However in the case of vishvarupa darshana, the drshya is the visva, which includes ones own body and mind, and the one whom we "qualify" with the title of drshta, is in fact the attributeless consciousness , the satyam.
So a vishvarupa darshana of satchitananda is a wonderful mahavakya if we understand it in essence.
Satchidananda is none other than the drshta. The vishvarupa is also none other than than the drshta alone, the rupa being that of the entire visva, known + unknown.
The mind , body, the instruments, the experienced objects, ALL of this is the visvarupa, the seer is very much a part of this visvarupa, is there is a"seen" without a "seer" ever, of course not. i am taking about the here and now experience of oneself, in ones own experience there is always seer and seen, so it is part of the vishvarupa. And what is the satyam of this "vishvarupa", the satyam is the reality which is the drshta oneself.
This really makes it "real" , the fact that "I" is not the experiencer or the experienced, rather "I"is the truth , and the "experienced experienceR" paradigm is the rupa, or visvarupa.
This knowledge alone is what qualifies to be called "visvarupa darshana of attributless consciousness".
The knowledge leaves nothing else to be attained, as everything is engulfed in oneself, and oneself is ever attained.
Satyam is attributeless or formless, and mithya has form or attributes.
So when we say vishvarupa darshana of satchidananda, one has to marvel at the usage of the words.
When we see a gold chain, it is chain rupa darshana of the satyam gold. In that case the drshta is different from drshya, since the drshya is a gold chain, while the drshta is a conscious seer.
However in the case of vishvarupa darshana, the drshya is the visva, which includes ones own body and mind, and the one whom we "qualify" with the title of drshta, is in fact the attributeless consciousness , the satyam.
So a vishvarupa darshana of satchitananda is a wonderful mahavakya if we understand it in essence.
Satchidananda is none other than the drshta. The vishvarupa is also none other than than the drshta alone, the rupa being that of the entire visva, known + unknown.
The mind , body, the instruments, the experienced objects, ALL of this is the visvarupa, the seer is very much a part of this visvarupa, is there is a"seen" without a "seer" ever, of course not. i am taking about the here and now experience of oneself, in ones own experience there is always seer and seen, so it is part of the vishvarupa. And what is the satyam of this "vishvarupa", the satyam is the reality which is the drshta oneself.
This really makes it "real" , the fact that "I" is not the experiencer or the experienced, rather "I"is the truth , and the "experienced experienceR" paradigm is the rupa, or visvarupa.
This knowledge alone is what qualifies to be called "visvarupa darshana of attributless consciousness".
The knowledge leaves nothing else to be attained, as everything is engulfed in oneself, and oneself is ever attained.
No comments:
Post a Comment