Object doesnt reduce to brahman

 In my head I am trying to resolve or reduce objects into brahman

This indicates a false understanding

Objects when we say IS, there is no brahman Object that IS

Brahman is non object , non subject that IS

Truth of both subject and object

So there is no possibility of reducing anything, as brahman cannot undergo any change or vikara

When we say Object IS, brahman is already being referred to as IS

The object is brahman, but brahman is not an object

So nothing is there to reduce, neither can be reduced, brahman cannot be reduced or changed need not be

What appears as object IS brahman, while brahman is no object

What appears as subject IS brahma, while brahman is not subject

Also there is not object brahman inside of the object which is referred to, non object brahman, non subject brahman is self evident I. Object itself is that brahman, while brahman transcends object.

Self evident I, because I am self evident, but I dont know that I am non subect, non object brahman, that is truth of subject and object

So I am self evident I that is truth of all subject and objects

I am myself non subject and non object

So subject and object IS when is said, IS refers to non subject, non object I

Or in other words satyam I

satchitananda I

Here object need not be reduced, as anything reduced will remain an object

Rather Nothing is reduced here

All here remains whole

Via jnana chaksu I see that any object IS, no subject non object, limitless brahman