Prapancha is not for bhoga , it is for rasa and leela

 Prapancha is not for bhoga.

Reason is bhoga buddhi is due to ajnana.

Clearly it is said 'wrong perception'.

Wrong perception means wrong pursuit in itself. It is incorrect.

There is no link between what you pursue , how you pursue and what you want.

You want to be whole, complete , purnaH.

You cannot look at yourself as incomplete and keep hoping experiential bhoga will lead you to become complete, this will always be a time bound, limited graded experience alone, even for prajapatir Ananda upto, unless they know the truth. 

You cannot become whole via experience.

The broken person, cannot be mended with experience bandage. 

The person has to be addressed, addressed via knowledge alone, given person is already whole, already the advaitam, non dual, consciousness, one without a second. 

This person cannot be a wanting person. 

Hence a non wanting person, will not look upon prapancha as a desire fulfilling prapancha or as a bhoga.

Rather looks at prapancha as an entertainment, a leela, that is produced with oneself as vivarta upAdana kArana. I am vivarta upAdana kArana for maya mind and maya jagat.

I am whole, one without a second. 

For whole I, the maya prapancha has a different lens to it.

It is seen as a variety, novelty and beauty. When these are experienced, you experience the ananda rasa, that is your own leela or your own pure prema , devoid of any bhoga or kama drsti.

For such an experience, you have to assimilate that the experience is your svarupa, your self. Experience has to be assimilated into self. When experience is assimilated into self, then experience becomes a source of novelty, beauty and variety, while self remains the source of existence, stability and security. 

The self offers existence, stability and security to the variety, novelty and beauty of the universe. Hence these variety novelty and beauty can be seen as expression of the self, as non separate from the self. It can be seen as ' an expression' of the self. 

When seeing as such, am I not giving reality to the prapancha?

No I retain the reality as nishprapancha, while giving reality to prapancha, which exists in me as though without really existing.